Essarr LoreBook

Trying to go against the current

User Tools

Site Tools


lb:dune

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
lb:dune [2025-09-06 06:11:38] – [Mentats] ninjasrlb:dune [2025-09-26 14:13:21] (current) – [DUNE] ninjasr
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== DUNE ====== ====== DUNE ======
 +{{template>r-banner|media=dune|caption=“Drugs are necessary for enlightenment!!!” Sure they are, Frank. Let's just sit down and talk, kay?}}
 **DUNE** is a book written by Frank Herbert which had a few sequels and got adapted a few times. It's considered by some to be the cornerstone of sci-fi.((:fn:>Which is quite puzzling because it is very far removed from sci-fi...like how //A Song of Ice and Fire// is far removed from Fantasy.)) **DUNE** is a book written by Frank Herbert which had a few sequels and got adapted a few times. It's considered by some to be the cornerstone of sci-fi.((:fn:>Which is quite puzzling because it is very far removed from sci-fi...like how //A Song of Ice and Fire// is far removed from Fantasy.))
  
-I've only seen the (new) films, so this article will be focused around that. Unfortunately, the only Dune book I own is God Emperor of Dune...which isn't really the first book.+I've only seen the (new) films, so this article will be focused around that. Unfortunately, the only Dune book I own is //God Emperor of Dune//...which isn't really the first book.
 {{tag>films}} {{tag>films}}
 +<WRAP centeralign>
 +[[lb:dune:Jessica]]
 +</WRAP>
 ===== Reviews ===== ===== Reviews =====
 +==== Dune (1984) ====
 +I have no idea what to say about this one. It's so weird that...
 +
 +Is it bad? Probably. But it's also more enjoyable than the new films at times.
 +
 +Also, Lady Jessica was not great, which is a far greater sin.
 ==== DUNE (Part 1) ==== ==== DUNE (Part 1) ====
 I think this film takes itself too seriously and comes off as boring/pretentious at times. Though this might actually make it match Frank Herbert's vision...as he //also// comes off as pretentious to me. I think this film takes itself too seriously and comes off as boring/pretentious at times. Though this might actually make it match Frank Herbert's vision...as he //also// comes off as pretentious to me.
Line 61: Line 71:
 It's possible that Buddislam //could// exist if we assume that it merged with some completely distinct offshoot of Islam (but then it wouldn't be called ‘Islam’). Or if Islam adopted some Buddhist beliefs, which is still unlikely due to the Quran being absolute. It's possible that Buddislam //could// exist if we assume that it merged with some completely distinct offshoot of Islam (but then it wouldn't be called ‘Islam’). Or if Islam adopted some Buddhist beliefs, which is still unlikely due to the Quran being absolute.
 ===== Trivilinks ===== ===== Trivilinks =====
 +  * [[https://dune.fandom.com/wiki/Dune_Wiki|Dune Fandom Wiki]]
 +    * My experience with it is...generally positive. It manages to avoid two big pitfalls of most fandom wikis:
 +      - It only sticks to what is definitively ‘canon’: Frank Herbert's books.
 +      - It doesn't got into too much details, so articles are relatively short and concise.
 +    * Honestly, I love it.
   * Once I think of what to put here, I'll put it here.   * Once I think of what to put here, I'll put it here.
 +  * I don't really like the //desert// aesthetic. I would have called it Arab, but that would be inaccurate, since it //isn't// Arabic.
lb/dune.1757139098.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025-09-06 06:11:38 by ninjasr

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki