Essarr LoreBook

Trying to go against the current

User Tools

Site Tools


lb:jak

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
lb:jak [2026-02-13 16:58:54] – [Jak & Daxter] ninjasrlb:jak [2026-05-17 12:23:00] (current) – [Trivilinks] ninjasr
Line 35: Line 35:
       * An overall look at the Jak series by someone who isn't a very big fan. Although I don't completely agree with him on every point((:fn:>I particularly dislike what he says about the Precursor Legacy.)), I find this video to be one of the better evaluations of the series as a whole, and he lays out it's most serious flaw the best.       * An overall look at the Jak series by someone who isn't a very big fan. Although I don't completely agree with him on every point((:fn:>I particularly dislike what he says about the Precursor Legacy.)), I find this video to be one of the better evaluations of the series as a whole, and he lays out it's most serious flaw the best.
     * [[you>WlqwRJHeuuU|The Jak Trilogy Analysis | Naughty Dog's Renegade Platformer]] by [[lb:thegamingbrit]]     * [[you>WlqwRJHeuuU|The Jak Trilogy Analysis | Naughty Dog's Renegade Platformer]] by [[lb:thegamingbrit]]
-      * A more positive outlook on the Jak series, and far better argued. Like with the above, I don't entirely agree, but find myself agreeing more on the Precursor Legacy front. He does brush aside the series' biggest flaw, while arguing the first game suffered from it.((:fn:>The flaw being the Identity crisis of course. The first game is very clear about what it is, and what it wants to be, and could have been a fantastic foundation for future sequels - which could have perfected the formula. It's the second game onward that suffers from an identity crisis.)) However, it's the only video I've seen that has been able to convincingly claim that Jak 2 is a good follow-up to the Precursor Legacy, despite the serious shift.+      * A more positive outlook on the Jak series, and far better argued. Like with the above, I don't entirely agree, but find myself agreeing more on the Precursor Legacy front. He does brush aside the series' biggest flaw, while arguing the first game suffered from it.((:fn:>The flaw being the identity crisis of course. The first game is very clear about what it is, and what it wants to be, and could have been a fantastic foundation for future sequels - which could have perfected the formula. It's the second game onward that suffers from an identity crisis.)) However, it's the only video I've seen that has been able to convincingly claim that Jak 2 is a good follow-up to the Precursor Legacy, despite the serious shift.
  
  
lb/jak.txt · Last modified: 2026-05-17 12:23:00 by ninjasr

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki