Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- lb:jak [2025-07-10 13:20:25] – [Potential Future] ninjasr
+++ lb:jak [2026-05-17 12:23:00] (current) – [Trivilinks] ninjasr
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Jak & Daxter ======
+<div subtitle>
+{{tag>games speculah}}
+</div>
 {{ img:b:r:jak.png?460 |Jak & Daxter}}
 **Jak & Daxter the Precursor Legacy** is one of my favorite games of all time, and one of the first games I probably ever played. For years I believed there weren't any additional Jak games, so imagine my ecstasy when I discovered there were more...and then imagine my disappointment once I realized they were nothing like Precursor Legacy.
-{{tag>games speculah}}
 ===== Reviews =====
@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
       * An overall look at the Jak series by someone who isn't a very big fan. Although I don't completely agree with him on every point((:fn:>I particularly dislike what he says about the Precursor Legacy.)), I find this video to be one of the better evaluations of the series as a whole, and he lays out it's most serious flaw the best.
     * [[you>WlqwRJHeuuU|The Jak Trilogy Analysis | Naughty Dog's Renegade Platformer]] by [[lb:thegamingbrit]]
-      * A more positive outlook on the Jak series, and far better argued. Like with the above, I don't entirely agree, but find myself agreeing more on the Precursor Legacy front. He does brush aside the series' biggest flaw, while arguing the first game suffered from it.((:fn:>The flaw being the Identity crisis of course. The first game is very clear about what it is, and what it wants to be, and could have been a fantastic foundation for future sequels - which could have perfected the formula. It's the second game onward that suffers from an identity crisis.)) However, it's the only video I've seen that has been able to convincingly claim that Jak 2 is a good follow-up to the Precursor Legacy, despite the serious shift.
+      * A more positive outlook on the Jak series, and far better argued. Like with the above, I don't entirely agree, but find myself agreeing more on the Precursor Legacy front. He does brush aside the series' biggest flaw, while arguing the first game suffered from it.((:fn:>The flaw being the identity crisis of course. The first game is very clear about what it is, and what it wants to be, and could have been a fantastic foundation for future sequels - which could have perfected the formula. It's the second game onward that suffers from an identity crisis.)) However, it's the only video I've seen that has been able to convincingly claim that Jak 2 is a good follow-up to the Precursor Legacy, despite the serious shift.