Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- lb:japanese.kumbaya [2025-09-07 18:30:29] – [Cliché Critique] ninjasr
+++ lb:japanese.kumbaya [2026-01-20 16:06:23] (current) – [Code Geass] ninjasr
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 However, I think it can go into a few directions:
-  * The plot will revolve around someone attempting to go back to the state of war.
+  * The plot will revolve around someone attempting to go back to the state of war.((:fn:>I believe this is the case in //Allison//.))
   * The world just straight-up devolves back into war.
   * The story starts meandering.
+  * The same thing happens again.((:fn:>You see this in [[lb:le]] where Gin'yoku no Fam just repeats the Japanese Kumbaya thing from the first season.))
+  * The story starts to focus on something vaguely related but ultimately distinct.((:fn:>Also the case with //Allison//, specifically the second volume.))
+Though I haven't observed this //that// much, since stories don't tend to continue after the fact that often.
 ===== Possible Explanation? =====
 I thought of this recently, but realized that...//maybe// there is a situation where a line of reasoning can lead you to conclude this actually makes sense.
@@ Line 44: / Line 46: @@
 [[lb:codegeass]] is a...I don't know whether interesting or not example.\\
 Code Geass understands that ‘hatred’ isn't all that drives warfare...but it clearly assumes that hatred plays a big part.\\
-The <wrap spoiler>Zero Requiem plan</wrap> is, in fact, directly dependent on this assumption to work. Though it's kinda quirky because of //how// it's all set up...yeah, it's just weird. Like all of Code Geass I guess. I'd need more time to think about it.
+The <mark spoiler>Zero Requiem plan</mark> is, in fact, directly dependent on this assumption to work. Though it's kinda quirky because of //how// it's all set up...yeah, it's just weird. Like all of Code Geass I guess. I'd need more time to think about it.
 ==== Cross Ange ====
 I added [[lb:croan]] to this list at some point, but forgot why. I think it's because the assumption is //there// though it doesn't quite go into this cliché's territory as far as I remember.