lb:opinion:issues.with.chans
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
lb:opinion:issues.with.chans [2025-04-29 08:39:59] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | lb:opinion:issues.with.chans [2025-04-29 08:40:36] (current) – ninjasr | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== Issues with Chans ====== | ||
+ | **Very Important Note**: I wrote this a long time ago and I don't necessarily agree with everything I've written here. I've only minimally changed it to make it more readable, but otherwise kept it the same. It's being kept here for the sake of posterity. | ||
+ | I've observed a few things in the [[lb: | ||
+ | And it is my opinion, that if // | ||
+ | I imagine there are many who may disagree with me, and I am willing to hear others out. | ||
+ | {{tag> | ||
+ | ===== Minimal Evolution ===== | ||
+ | Despite how old many of the chans are, they have changed very little. To be more specific, I'm talking about the // | ||
+ | Using [[lb: | ||
+ | While it's undoubtedly impressive this site has been around for almost 2 decades, what significant changes have really occurred?\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | I should note something so readers don't get confused: I don't think any fundamental changes should be made, but that minor changes are sufficient.\\ | ||
+ | My idea of 'minor changes' | ||
+ | I believe other chans, particularly [[lb: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | My reason for identifying this as an issue is due to how new users will perceive the aged chans. It's very important to keep in mind that a new user doesn' | ||
+ | Besides this, a new user may find the lack of 4chan-x-like features to make using these sites a little frustrating - I know I do. | ||
+ | ===== Fear of Growth ===== | ||
+ | I get the impression chans seem scared of growing larger; this is understandable.\\ | ||
+ | Chans don't want to lose their unique culture and a large influx of new users is sure to //kill// or significantly dilute their unique culture.\\ | ||
+ | However, and this is very important to note, chans outside of 4chan are very slow. In fact, users((: | ||
+ | However, as long as there aren't enough users, chans will remain slow. I'm definitely not the first to notice this (it is, after all, basic logic); many chan dwellers have also likely realized this.\\ | ||
+ | This leads to a dilemma. Chans are slow; they can only get faster if they gain more users; new users are undesirable due to the potential loss of the unique culture.\\ | ||
+ | The solution most users seemed to land on was to simply freeze. If neither option (increasing the speed at loss of culture; preserving the culture at loss of speed) is desirable, then making no decision is most desirable. Unfortunately, | ||
+ | ===== Conclusion ===== | ||
+ | Currently, chans, and their culture, seem to be in a slow decline. I believe I have identified two of the issues facing the chans. I have certainly missed a few, or made a mistake when identifying these two and, for that, I can only apologize.\\ | ||
+ | Essentially, | ||
+ | ===== Trivilinks ===== | ||
+ | * Readers shouldn' | ||
+ | * Readers should also keep in mind that I am a relative newcomer to the [[lb: | ||
+ | * A few sections were intended to be included, but I removed them for one reason or another. | ||
+ | * //Obsession with Anonymity// - I realized this isn't that big of a problem. Chan culture (among the smaller chans) is already dominated by namefags anyway. | ||
+ | * // | ||
+ | * Many of these observations likely don't apply to 4chan. |