Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- lb:opinion:on.neo-elvish [2025-08-24 06:46:06] – [On Neo-Elvish] ninjasr
+++ lb:opinion:on.neo-elvish [2025-08-24 14:35:57] (current) – [Neo-Elvish] ninjasr
@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 The arguments in favor are based around the desire to speak these languages. The arguments against are that they'd go against Tolkien's vision.
-Carl F. Hostetter goes a step further and believes that Tolkien wouldn't like people's attempts to finish his languages for him. That's something I'm not sure about, as it seems a serious leap in logic.((:fn:>I also think it's a leap to suggest Tolkien didn't want to speak his own languages, which is something that Mr. Hostetter seems to sincerely believe. I don't know Tolkien as much, but I found it doubtful.))
+Carl F. Hostetter goes a step further and believes that Tolkien wouldn't like people's attempts to finish his languages for him. That's something I'm not sure about, as it seems a serious leap in logic.((:fn:>I also think it's a leap to suggest Tolkien didn't want to speak his own languages, which is something that Mr. Hostetter seems to sincerely believe. I don't know Tolkien as much, but I found it doubtful. Hostetter's argument seems to be based around the fact Tolkien constantly changed the languages. But this //also// applies to Tolkien's stories. So, does that mean that Tolkien had no inclination to finish //The Silmarillion// either? I think that Occam's Razor suggests that Tolkien //did// have the intent to speak Quenya/Sindarin and never did because he just didn't finish the languages due to his own perfectionism – just like //The Silmarillion//.))
 Moving on, I think that the conflict here is kinda dumb, because it should be obvious to onlookers that Tolkien's motivations for making the languages and the Neo-Elvish effort are two different things. Though I'm not sure I can articulate exactly what I mean right now.\\