Essarr LoreBook

Trying to go against the current

User Tools

Site Tools

lb:socjus

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
lb:socjus [2025-07-19 10:10:29] – ninjasrlb:socjus [2025-07-19 18:20:23] (current) – [New Atheists] ninjasr
Line 6: Line 6:
 Chicago Press, 1983).’ according to their footnote.)) Chicago Press, 1983).’ according to their footnote.))
  
-**Social Justice**, or SocJus, is a collection of post-modernist ideologies and, like post-modernism, they call all be comfortably described as evil.+**Social Justice**, or SocJus, is a collection of post-modernist ideologies and, like post-modernism, they call all comfortably be described as evil.
  
 Now that I've scared away the casuals by explicitly calling it evil, let me explain what the purpose of this article is...//clarity//.\\ Now that I've scared away the casuals by explicitly calling it evil, let me explain what the purpose of this article is...//clarity//.\\
Line 177: Line 177:
  
 Feminist Theory is cooperating with Critical Race Theory despite CRT including black men among their oppressed. To avoid this blatant contradiction, Feminist Theory (temporarily) adjusts its own position of seeing //all// men as the oppressors to singling out //white// men as the oppressors.\\ Feminist Theory is cooperating with Critical Race Theory despite CRT including black men among their oppressed. To avoid this blatant contradiction, Feminist Theory (temporarily) adjusts its own position of seeing //all// men as the oppressors to singling out //white// men as the oppressors.\\
-This position is then maintained and enforced even after you point out the fact that, per capita, black men are more abusive towards men than white men are (or really, any other race is). Or that black men are //especially// abusive towards white women.\\+This position is then maintained and enforced even after you point out the fact that, per capita, black men are more abusive towards women than white men are (or really, any other race is). Or that black men are //especially// abusive towards white women.\\
 This is where it's important to note that Feminist Theory //doesn't care// about these facts because, at the moment, they are allied with CRT: you can’t just say that your ally is bad, as that's besides the point of the (temporary) alliance. If CRT downplays, denies and excuses this behavior; Feminist Theory will as well. This is where it's important to note that Feminist Theory //doesn't care// about these facts because, at the moment, they are allied with CRT: you can’t just say that your ally is bad, as that's besides the point of the (temporary) alliance. If CRT downplays, denies and excuses this behavior; Feminist Theory will as well.
  
Line 213: Line 213:
   * Critical Race Theory believes that Cleopatra was black despite overwhelming evidence making it clear she was Greek.((:fn:>There's even some evidence, as I've heard it, that she may have had //light hair//. Though that's speculation based on the fact she dyed her hair.)) And she probably had light skin.   * Critical Race Theory believes that Cleopatra was black despite overwhelming evidence making it clear she was Greek.((:fn:>There's even some evidence, as I've heard it, that she may have had //light hair//. Though that's speculation based on the fact she dyed her hair.)) And she probably had light skin.
   * CRT also doesn't care that the Arab Slave Trade was much larger and far more brutal than the Atlantic Slave Trade.   * CRT also doesn't care that the Arab Slave Trade was much larger and far more brutal than the Atlantic Slave Trade.
-  * Feminist Theory believes that women are actively oppressed despite have more freedom now than at any other point in history.+  * Feminist Theory believes that women are actively oppressed despite having more freedom now than at any other point in history.
   * Feminist Theory also doesn't care that life honestly wasn't that bad for women thruout history. In fact, you can point to several moments where life was very pleasant.   * Feminist Theory also doesn't care that life honestly wasn't that bad for women thruout history. In fact, you can point to several moments where life was very pleasant.
   * Queer Theory believes that Gender Dysphoria isn't a mental illness.   * Queer Theory believes that Gender Dysphoria isn't a mental illness.
Line 262: Line 262:
 So, to avoid this...they just avoid thinking about these things. But this results in most of their philosophical positions being contradictory and incoherent. So, to avoid this...they just avoid thinking about these things. But this results in most of their philosophical positions being contradictory and incoherent.
 ==== Classification ==== ==== Classification ====
-Broadly, I think that adherents of SocJus can be broadly placed into three categories.\\+Broadly, I think that adherents of SocJus can be placed into three categories.\\
 Those being: Those being:
   - The ideologically pure.   - The ideologically pure.
Line 274: Line 274:
 These are also the easiest to break free from the ideology and the most likely to become victims of ostracization. These are also the easiest to break free from the ideology and the most likely to become victims of ostracization.
  
-Half-Hearted typically aren't as tuned-into the ideology as the Ideologically Pure, so they often find themselves running afoul of the eternal purity test.+Half-Hearted typically aren't as tuned-in to the ideology as the Ideologically Pure, so they often find themselves running afoul of the eternal purity test.
  
-Basically, anyone who says “I was woke once but I'm not every since x” then they're almost certainly a former Half-Hearted.+Basically, anyone who says “I was woke once but I'm not ever since x” then they're almost certainly a former Half-Hearted.
  
 These differentiate themselves further by having the capacity to see their own hypocritical beliefs. Though their solution to avoiding being hypocritical is the freeze and voluntary shutdown. These differentiate themselves further by having the capacity to see their own hypocritical beliefs. Though their solution to avoiding being hypocritical is the freeze and voluntary shutdown.
Line 314: Line 314:
 I was initially hesitant to bring it up just because of how soul-crushing it is, but the Pakistani Grooming Gangs in the UK are the ultimate proof that SocJus is dangerous. The existence of these gangs and their lack of punishment is a direct consequence of SocJus dominance in the UK. Though I won't go into detail because finding information on them isn't difficult and I don't really want to. But keep in mind that the response chosen was to //pretend they didn't exist// because it directly contradicted SocJus ideology. I was initially hesitant to bring it up just because of how soul-crushing it is, but the Pakistani Grooming Gangs in the UK are the ultimate proof that SocJus is dangerous. The existence of these gangs and their lack of punishment is a direct consequence of SocJus dominance in the UK. Though I won't go into detail because finding information on them isn't difficult and I don't really want to. But keep in mind that the response chosen was to //pretend they didn't exist// because it directly contradicted SocJus ideology.
  
-Additional evidence which shows the negative effect of SocJus in real-life is the case of mass migration into Europe, which has led to untold suffering in Western Europe while countries that oppose it are getting punished for doing so.+Additional evidence which shows the negative effect of SocJus in real-life is the case of mass migration into Europe, which has led to untold suffering in Western Europe while countries that oppose it are getting punished for avoiding it.
  
 New York and Los Angeles were formerly highly prestigious and beautiful cities which were reduced to something lesser as a result of SocJus leadership. New York and Los Angeles were formerly highly prestigious and beautiful cities which were reduced to something lesser as a result of SocJus leadership.
Line 332: Line 332:
 > My point is not that everything is bad, but that everything is dangerous, which is not exactly the same as bad. If everything is dangerous, then we always have something to do. So, my position leads not to apathy but to a hyper- and pessimistic activism. I think that the ethico-political choice we have to make every day is to determine which is the main danger. > My point is not that everything is bad, but that everything is dangerous, which is not exactly the same as bad. If everything is dangerous, then we always have something to do. So, my position leads not to apathy but to a hyper- and pessimistic activism. I think that the ethico-political choice we have to make every day is to determine which is the main danger.
  
-This quote, which I include in the opening text, is by **//Foucault//** – one of the **founders** of Post-Modernism.\\+This quote is by **//Foucault//** – one of the **founders** of Post-Modernism.\\
 To put this quote into layman's terms: it means that there is //always// more to fight, more to demand and more to gain. It's just that, in the short-term, they need to figure out what to prioritize. But the fight will never end. To put this quote into layman's terms: it means that there is //always// more to fight, more to demand and more to gain. It's just that, in the short-term, they need to figure out what to prioritize. But the fight will never end.
  
Line 366: Line 366:
 | Moral Panic Christianity           | Christians                                    | Satanists, atheists                                                                   | Media; table-top games; video games                                                                              |  No                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | | Moral Panic Christianity           | Christians                                    | Satanists, atheists                                                                   | Media; table-top games; video games                                                                              |  No                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
 | Open-Source Software Movement      | Developers, Users                             | Microsoft (primarily); Apple (secondarily); corporations; the Free Software Movement  | Proprietary software; closed source code; Embrace, Extend, Extinguish; overly-restrictive Open-Source Licensing  |  50/50((:fn:>They think that ideology is distracting. So it's more of a pragmatic disagreement than one over principles. But many big projects still go all-in. There's also a lot of overlap with the Free Software Movement.))                                  | | Open-Source Software Movement      | Developers, Users                             | Microsoft (primarily); Apple (secondarily); corporations; the Free Software Movement  | Proprietary software; closed source code; Embrace, Extend, Extinguish; overly-restrictive Open-Source Licensing  |  50/50((:fn:>They think that ideology is distracting. So it's more of a pragmatic disagreement than one over principles. But many big projects still go all-in. There's also a lot of overlap with the Free Software Movement.))                                  |
-| Post-Modern Anti-Semitism          | Non-Jews                                      | Jews                                                                                  | Anything controlled by Jews: the media; Hollywood; Banks; Health Industry; etc.                                  | No                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | +| Post-Modern Anti-Semitism          | Non-Jews                                      | Jews                                                                                  | Anything controlled by Jews: the media; Hollywood; Banks; Health Industry; etc.                                  |  No                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | 
-| Post-Modern Ukrainian Nationalism  | Ukrainians                                    | Russians, Rusophiles                                                                  | Russian Propaganda                                                                                               | Yes((:fn:>SocJus voluntarily adopted the position that Ukraine was better. Though Ukrainians themselves probably don't care.))                                                                                                                                    | +| Post-Modern Ukrainian Nationalism  | Ukrainians                                    | Russians, Rusophiles                                                                  | Russian Propaganda                                                                                               |  Yes((:fn:>SocJus voluntarily adopted the position that Ukraine was better. Though Ukrainians themselves probably don't care.))                                                                                                                                   | 
-| Piracy                             | Consumers                                     | Corporations                                                                          | Copyright law                                                                                                    | 50/50((:fn:>Individual pirates generally are not (they associate corporations with SocJus) but the European Pirate Parties are.))                                                                                                                                 |+| Piracy                             | Consumers                                     | Corporations                                                                          | Copyright law                                                                                                    |  50/50((:fn:>Individual pirates generally are not (they associate corporations with SocJus) but the European Pirate Parties are.))                                                                                                                                |
 | Satanism                           | Satanists; atheists; apatheists               | Christians                                                                            | The Bible; Insinuating Satan is bad                                                                              |  Yes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | | Satanism                           | Satanists; atheists; apatheists               | Christians                                                                            | The Bible; Insinuating Satan is bad                                                                              |  Yes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
 | SocJus Islam                       | Muslims                                       | Everyone else                                                                         | Non-Sharia law; secularism                                                                                       |  50/50((:fn:>Derived from Post-Colonial Theory, but can vary between those who are SocJus cosplaying as real Muslims or radical Islamists. The latter are opportunists, the former are stupid. Hasan Piker is probably the pre-eminent example of a cosplayer.))  | | SocJus Islam                       | Muslims                                       | Everyone else                                                                         | Non-Sharia law; secularism                                                                                       |  50/50((:fn:>Derived from Post-Colonial Theory, but can vary between those who are SocJus cosplaying as real Muslims or radical Islamists. The latter are opportunists, the former are stupid. Hasan Piker is probably the pre-eminent example of a cosplayer.))  |
-| SocJus Judaism                     | Jews                                          | Anti-Semites                                                                          | Holocaust denial; anti-semitic conspiracy theories                                                               | Yes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |+| SocJus Judaism                     | Jews                                          | Anti-Semites                                                                          | Holocaust denial; anti-semitic conspiracy theories                                                               |  Yes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
 | Veganism                           | Animals, vegans                               | Meat-eaters; restaurants; food industry                                               | I...can’t actually think of anything specific.                                                                   |  Yes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | | Veganism                           | Animals, vegans                               | Meat-eaters; restaurants; food industry                                               | I...can’t actually think of anything specific.                                                                   |  Yes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
 | TERFs (Feminist Theory)            | Women                                         | Men; Transgenders                                                                     | Same as Feminist Theory; Queer Theory                                                                            |  No((:fn:>Split off from SocJus.))                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | | TERFs (Feminist Theory)            | Women                                         | Men; Transgenders                                                                     | Same as Feminist Theory; Queer Theory                                                                            |  No((:fn:>Split off from SocJus.))                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
Line 397: Line 397:
  
 A lot of open-source projects gravitate towards SocJus via things like Codes of Conduct and disassociation with certain projects. There are some very extreme and laughable examples of this happening too, like Hundred Rabbits (100R) choosing to leave Github because Microsoft sells Office to ICE. No, I'm not joking, that is their actual reasoning.\\ A lot of open-source projects gravitate towards SocJus via things like Codes of Conduct and disassociation with certain projects. There are some very extreme and laughable examples of this happening too, like Hundred Rabbits (100R) choosing to leave Github because Microsoft sells Office to ICE. No, I'm not joking, that is their actual reasoning.\\
-Another blatant example of this would be [[https://nilesoft.org|Nilesoft]] which is a Windows Context Menu customizer. What on Earth does that have to do with with war in Palestine?+Another blatant example of this would be [[https://nilesoft.org|Nilesoft]] which is a Windows Context Menu customizer. What on Earth does that have to do with the war in Palestine?
  
 Both ideologies also have that one big enemy: Microsoft. And, yes, it's explicitly Microsoft. This is because neither movement cares what corporations they work with provided those corporations aren't Microsoft.\\ Both ideologies also have that one big enemy: Microsoft. And, yes, it's explicitly Microsoft. This is because neither movement cares what corporations they work with provided those corporations aren't Microsoft.\\
 A very small list of corporations they're fine with would be IBM, Red Hat, Sun Microsystems (when they still existed), Apple, Oracle and many more I can’t think of. A lot of these are at times much much worse than Microsoft, yet they don't care: because //Microsoft is the enemy//, not //Oracle//. A very small list of corporations they're fine with would be IBM, Red Hat, Sun Microsystems (when they still existed), Apple, Oracle and many more I can’t think of. A lot of these are at times much much worse than Microsoft, yet they don't care: because //Microsoft is the enemy//, not //Oracle//.
  
-And like any other Post-Modern ideology, they have the same blindspots. They don't realize that “Embrace, Extend, Extinguish” is a far better description of GNU and Linux's approach to competition than it does Microsoft.\\+And like any other Post-Modern ideology, they have the same blindspots. They don't realize that “Embrace, Extend, Extinguish” is a far better description of GNU and Linux's approach to competition than it does Microsoft's.\\
 The GNU Project was explicitly founded to clone proprietary software, then promote their use over proprietary software with the explicit goal of becoming the standard to kill proprietary software. How this is seen as ethical is beyond me, but Post-Modernists are not exactly rational thinkers.\\ The GNU Project was explicitly founded to clone proprietary software, then promote their use over proprietary software with the explicit goal of becoming the standard to kill proprietary software. How this is seen as ethical is beyond me, but Post-Modernists are not exactly rational thinkers.\\
 Linux has a similar approach, though it could be argued it's accidental rather than intentional like in the case of the GNU. Linux has a similar approach, though it could be argued it's accidental rather than intentional like in the case of the GNU.
Line 412: Line 412:
 Something else that's important to note is that the Free Software Movement //cannot// and //will not// support the abolition of copyright. On the surface this is strange and a little contradictory, but it makes sense once you realize...the truth.\\ Something else that's important to note is that the Free Software Movement //cannot// and //will not// support the abolition of copyright. On the surface this is strange and a little contradictory, but it makes sense once you realize...the truth.\\
 Both movements enforce Open-Source via their //software licenses// which dictate what can and can’t be done with their code. Without the license, there's no way to make sure that any fork of a project remains open-source (which is what they want).\\ Both movements enforce Open-Source via their //software licenses// which dictate what can and can’t be done with their code. Without the license, there's no way to make sure that any fork of a project remains open-source (which is what they want).\\
-Those software licenses are //copyright licenses// and, thus, //copyright// is a tool they sue to enforce open-source.+Those software licenses are //copyright licenses// and, thus, //copyright// is a tool they use to enforce open-source.
  
 This is why they're always quiet when the topic of abolishing copyright comes up: their movements would immediately disintegrate. This is why they're always quiet when the topic of abolishing copyright comes up: their movements would immediately disintegrate.
Line 476: Line 476:
 I want to write a dedicated article about [[lb:New Atheism]] at some point, so I'll try to keep this brief. I'll also note that this is one of the ideologies I disliked //before// realizing they were Post-Modernist. I want to write a dedicated article about [[lb:New Atheism]] at some point, so I'll try to keep this brief. I'll also note that this is one of the ideologies I disliked //before// realizing they were Post-Modernist.
  
-New Atheists clearly exemplify all the behaviors of a Post-Modern ideology and I felt a little embarrassed once I realized this. Their position is inherently irrational((:fn:>The idea that capital-G God doesn't exist and if he did we should reject him. In addition, they believe that religion has no positive effects.)) and they're selective about facts.\\+New Atheists clearly exemplify all the behaviors of a Post-Modern ideology and I felt a little embarrassed once I realized this. Their position is inherently irrational((:fn:>The idea that capital-G God doesn't exist (I'll note I'm not a Christian or follow an Abrahamic faith – my point here is that the most rational position to take is that you //don't know//, not that God //doesn't exist//) and if he did we should reject him. In addition, they believe that religion has no positive effects.)) and they're selective about facts.\\
 Plus, like many Post-modern ideologies, they tend to single out one entity as the main threat – Christianity – and mostly ignore other religions. Plus, like many Post-modern ideologies, they tend to single out one entity as the main threat – Christianity – and mostly ignore other religions.
  
Line 563: Line 563:
  
 As far as I know, the following ideas are tied to SocJus/Post-Modern thought in storytelling: As far as I know, the following ideas are tied to SocJus/Post-Modern thought in storytelling:
-  * [[lb:damsel.in.distress]] being universally negative.+  * [[lb:damsel.in.distress]] being universally perceived as negative.
   * [[lb:manic pixie dream girl|Manic Pixie Dream Girl]]. I believe the term originated with them and is considered universally negative.   * [[lb:manic pixie dream girl|Manic Pixie Dream Girl]]. I believe the term originated with them and is considered universally negative.
   * [[lb:ludo-narrative.dissonance]]: coined by Games Journalists, probably the pre-eminent example of being ideologically compromised.   * [[lb:ludo-narrative.dissonance]]: coined by Games Journalists, probably the pre-eminent example of being ideologically compromised.
lb/socjus.1752919829.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025-07-19 10:10:29 by ninjasr
Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki