Essarr LoreBook

Trying to go against the current

User Tools

Site Tools

lb:socjus

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
lb:socjus [2025-07-19 12:59:13] – [Half-Hearted] ninjasrlb:socjus [2025-09-05 14:19:58] (current) – [What is it?] ninjasr
Line 6: Line 6:
 Chicago Press, 1983).’ according to their footnote.)) Chicago Press, 1983).’ according to their footnote.))
  
-**Social Justice**, or SocJus, is a collection of post-modernist ideologies and, like post-modernism, they call all comfortably be described as evil.+**Social Justice**, or SocJus, is a collection of post-modernist ideologies and, like post-modernism, they can all comfortably be described as evil.
  
 Now that I've scared away the casuals by explicitly calling it evil, let me explain what the purpose of this article is...//clarity//.\\ Now that I've scared away the casuals by explicitly calling it evil, let me explain what the purpose of this article is...//clarity//.\\
Line 30: Line 30:
   * **Alan Sokal** and his books //[[libth>27742|Fashionable Nonsense]]// and //[[libth>4128977|Beyond the Hoax]]//. Alan Sokal noticed the spread of Post-Modernism in Academia and then orchestrated the Sokal Affair as a means of exposing it. He's since remained highly critical of Post-Modernism.((:fn:>Ironically, I've seen Post-Modernists (bad video essayists) on YouTube praise Sokal for the affair.))   * **Alan Sokal** and his books //[[libth>27742|Fashionable Nonsense]]// and //[[libth>4128977|Beyond the Hoax]]//. Alan Sokal noticed the spread of Post-Modernism in Academia and then orchestrated the Sokal Affair as a means of exposing it. He's since remained highly critical of Post-Modernism.((:fn:>Ironically, I've seen Post-Modernists (bad video essayists) on YouTube praise Sokal for the affair.))
   * **John McWorther** and his book //[[libth>26764956|Woke Racism]]//. His book is hyper-focused on Critical Race Theory, though I believe he exposes Post-Modern/SocJus tactics/beliefs in general.   * **John McWorther** and his book //[[libth>26764956|Woke Racism]]//. His book is hyper-focused on Critical Race Theory, though I believe he exposes Post-Modern/SocJus tactics/beliefs in general.
 +  * **Thorsten Renk** and his essay //[[http://www.science-and-fiction.org/essays/postmodern_philosophy.html|Comments on Postmodern Philosophy]]//. I haven't read the essay but I more-or-less know what it's about. Thorsten further describes himself (in other parts of his website) as opposed to Post-Modernism.
   * **Thomas Sowell** and the main work concerned with this is //[[libth>7982|The Vision of the Anointed]]//. I don't think he specifically attributes it to Post-Modernism, but it's notable because the tactics seem the same.   * **Thomas Sowell** and the main work concerned with this is //[[libth>7982|The Vision of the Anointed]]//. I don't think he specifically attributes it to Post-Modernism, but it's notable because the tactics seem the same.
 +    * I've checked and other books that may be notable (I've not read them) are [[libth>29477936|Social Justice Fallacies]] and [[libth>13691906|Intellectuals and Race]]. Though many of his works are relevant in some form – at least from my limited understanding.
 ==== Social Justice Versus social justice ==== ==== Social Justice Versus social justice ====
 Generally, the ideology is referred to as ‘Social Justice’, which follows the pattern of Post-Modernists being self-aggrandizing. This term should not be confused with ‘social justice’ – notice the lack of capitalization.\\ Generally, the ideology is referred to as ‘Social Justice’, which follows the pattern of Post-Modernists being self-aggrandizing. This term should not be confused with ‘social justice’ – notice the lack of capitalization.\\
Line 56: Line 58:
     * Used by: Mentis Wave (IIRC)     * Used by: Mentis Wave (IIRC)
     * Why: Cultural Marxism is the use of marxism to critique/analyze culture, which is similar to what Post-Modernism and SocJus do, so it's easy to confuse the two.     * Why: Cultural Marxism is the use of marxism to critique/analyze culture, which is similar to what Post-Modernism and SocJus do, so it's easy to confuse the two.
 +  * Globalism
 +    * Used by: Alex Jones (and others)
 +    * Why: SocJus is basically the same thing except that there isn't really a grand conspiracy. Their beliefs just happen to support ideas and strategies that line up with globalism as a concept.
   * Leftism   * Leftism
     * Used by: Themselves, right-wingers, Whatifalthist, Ubersoy, Carl Benjamin (Sargon of Akkad)     * Used by: Themselves, right-wingers, Whatifalthist, Ubersoy, Carl Benjamin (Sargon of Akkad)
Line 102: Line 107:
 ===== Description ===== ===== Description =====
 ==== A very brief history ==== ==== A very brief history ====
-As an ideology/philosophy, Post-Modernism originated in France among French Neo-Marxists who were very bitter and cynical about society. Thus they created the //most// cynical and evil ideology.+The following is //very// brief, //extremely// condensed and //simplified//. This is because I don't think knowing the history is super necessary for understanding the ideology.\\ 
 +The information I'm presenting here is mostly just repeating the history from //[[libth>24335173|Cynical Theories]]// and //[[libth>19087011|A Generation of Sociopaths]]//. More from the former than the latter. If you want a better and more detailed history, I recommend reading //[[libth>24335173|Cynical Theories]]//. Albeit, it's presented in a somewhat convoluted fashion.
  
-From France, it spread to the rest of the West primarily via Academia. Academia ended up as the ‘vanguard’ of Post-Modernism in a sense and this is why it is dominated by Post-Modern thinking.\\ +Post-Modernism originated in France among French Neo-Marxists who were very bitter and cynical about society. Thus they created the //most// cynical ideology.
-This infiltration occurred during the 1950s-1960s, if I recall correctly, which is also when it entered America specifically.+
  
-Post-Modernism attached itself to Boomers via Academia and, from there, started spreading to the rest of society. Though it wasn't that noticeable until the mid-late 90s, which is when it started to get //really// prominent. This is where Alan Sokal noticed and tried to expose it.\\ +From France, it spread to the rest of the West primarily via Academia.\\ 
-I think this is also when ‘Social Justice’ actually formed as an ideology, though the constituent parts can be traced back to the 60s.+Academia ended up as the ‘vanguard’ of Post-Modernism in a sense and this is why it is dominated by Post-Modern thinking in the present.\\ 
 +The infiltration into Academia occurred during the 1950s and 1960s, with it becoming prominent in American Academia in the 1960s.((:fn:>This date is an estimate based off of the information from //[[libth>24335173|Cynical Theories]]// and //[[libth>19087011|A Generation of Sociopaths]]//. What's important to note is that the ‘Hippie’ movement in the United States – and all derivative/sister movements – was post-modernist, which is why I'm singling out the 60s.))
  
-The ideology became practically mainstream in the late 2000s resulting in complete dominance in the 2010s. This is also where the first major popular backlash against it occurred in the form of GamerGate.((:fn:>GamerGate is also a complicated subject that I'm choosing to ignore. Nameless Rumia has the most neutral [[https://namelessrumia.heliohost.org/w/doku.php?id=gamergate|article]] on the it.)) This is also the reason why some people believe all this nonsense started with GamerGate: it didn't, GamerGate just made it visible.+Post-Modernism attached itself to Boomers via Academia and, from there, started spreading to the rest of society. Though it wasn't that noticeable until the mid-late 90s, which is when it started to get //really// prominent.((:fn:>Though you can still see Post-Modernism's influence in pop culture as far back as the early 70s – like in //The Amazing Spider-Man//.)) This is where Alan Sokal noticed and tried to expose it.\\ 
 +I think((:fn:>Where it definitively began is up for debate.)) this is also when ‘Social Justice’ actually formed as an ideology, though the constituent parts can be traced back to the 60s.
  
-GamerGate didn't really lead to an overall dismantling of Post-Modernism/SocJus, though it did cement gamers as the enemy. The early 2020s was when the cracks really started to form because, by this point, a lot more people became aware of ‘wokeism’ via pattern-recognition...and then started wholesale rejecting it.+The ideology became practically mainstream in the late 2000s resulting in complete dominance in the 2010s. This is also where the first major popular backlash against it occurred in the form of GamerGate.((:fn:>GamerGate is also a complicated subject that I'm choosing to ignore. Nameless Rumia has the most neutral [[https://namelessrumia.heliohost.org/w/doku.php?id=gamergate|article]] on it.)) This is also the reason why some people believe all this nonsense started with GamerGate; it didn't, GamerGate just made it visible. 
 + 
 +GamerGate didn't really lead to an overall dismantling of Post-Modernism/SocJus, though it did cement gamers as //the// enemy of Social Justice(tm). The early 2020s was when the cracks really started to form because, by this point, a lot more people became aware of ‘wokeism’ via pattern-recognition...and then started wholesale rejecting it.
  
 Currently, in 2025, SocJus is on the decline but remains quite influential. Post-Modernism itself seems to be partially but not fully affected. Hence the need for an article like this. Currently, in 2025, SocJus is on the decline but remains quite influential. Post-Modernism itself seems to be partially but not fully affected. Hence the need for an article like this.
 +==== What is it? =====
 +**Note:** I discovered that I actually did a bad job of explaining what post-modernism is which is obviously a grave error. I'll fix this issue at some point, hopefully in the near future.
  
- 
-This brief history is //very// brief, //extremely// condensed and //simplified// because I don't think it's super necessary for understanding the ideology. If you want a more detailed (and somewhat convoluted) explanation of the history, just read //[[libth>24335173|Cynical Theories]]//. 
- 
-==== What is it? ===== 
 SocJus is a Post-Modern ideology. I should note that I previously made the error of assuming it //was// Post-Modernism, which I realized was an error because there are //other// Post-Modern ideologies. But let's ignore those for now.\\ SocJus is a Post-Modern ideology. I should note that I previously made the error of assuming it //was// Post-Modernism, which I realized was an error because there are //other// Post-Modern ideologies. But let's ignore those for now.\\
 That said, SocJus is //probably// the purest Post-Modern ideology due to it being the closest to its originating roots. Plus it's the most radical. That said, SocJus is //probably// the purest Post-Modern ideology due to it being the closest to its originating roots. Plus it's the most radical.
Line 276: Line 283:
 Half-Hearted typically aren't as tuned-in to the ideology as the Ideologically Pure, so they often find themselves running afoul of the eternal purity test. Half-Hearted typically aren't as tuned-in to the ideology as the Ideologically Pure, so they often find themselves running afoul of the eternal purity test.
  
-Basically, anyone who says “I was woke once but I'm not every since x” then they're almost certainly a former Half-Hearted.+Basically, anyone who says “I was woke once but I'm not ever since x” then they're almost certainly a former Half-Hearted.
  
 These differentiate themselves further by having the capacity to see their own hypocritical beliefs. Though their solution to avoiding being hypocritical is the freeze and voluntary shutdown. These differentiate themselves further by having the capacity to see their own hypocritical beliefs. Though their solution to avoiding being hypocritical is the freeze and voluntary shutdown.
Line 314: Line 321:
 I was initially hesitant to bring it up just because of how soul-crushing it is, but the Pakistani Grooming Gangs in the UK are the ultimate proof that SocJus is dangerous. The existence of these gangs and their lack of punishment is a direct consequence of SocJus dominance in the UK. Though I won't go into detail because finding information on them isn't difficult and I don't really want to. But keep in mind that the response chosen was to //pretend they didn't exist// because it directly contradicted SocJus ideology. I was initially hesitant to bring it up just because of how soul-crushing it is, but the Pakistani Grooming Gangs in the UK are the ultimate proof that SocJus is dangerous. The existence of these gangs and their lack of punishment is a direct consequence of SocJus dominance in the UK. Though I won't go into detail because finding information on them isn't difficult and I don't really want to. But keep in mind that the response chosen was to //pretend they didn't exist// because it directly contradicted SocJus ideology.
  
-Additional evidence which shows the negative effect of SocJus in real-life is the case of mass migration into Europe, which has led to untold suffering in Western Europe while countries that oppose it are getting punished for doing so.+Additional evidence which shows the negative effect of SocJus in real-life is the case of mass migration into Europe, which has led to untold suffering in Western Europe while countries that oppose it are getting punished for avoiding it.
  
 New York and Los Angeles were formerly highly prestigious and beautiful cities which were reduced to something lesser as a result of SocJus leadership. New York and Los Angeles were formerly highly prestigious and beautiful cities which were reduced to something lesser as a result of SocJus leadership.
Line 332: Line 339:
 > My point is not that everything is bad, but that everything is dangerous, which is not exactly the same as bad. If everything is dangerous, then we always have something to do. So, my position leads not to apathy but to a hyper- and pessimistic activism. I think that the ethico-political choice we have to make every day is to determine which is the main danger. > My point is not that everything is bad, but that everything is dangerous, which is not exactly the same as bad. If everything is dangerous, then we always have something to do. So, my position leads not to apathy but to a hyper- and pessimistic activism. I think that the ethico-political choice we have to make every day is to determine which is the main danger.
  
-This quote, which I include in the opening text, is by **//Foucault//** – one of the **founders** of Post-Modernism.\\+This quote is by **//Foucault//** – one of the **founders** of Post-Modernism.\\
 To put this quote into layman's terms: it means that there is //always// more to fight, more to demand and more to gain. It's just that, in the short-term, they need to figure out what to prioritize. But the fight will never end. To put this quote into layman's terms: it means that there is //always// more to fight, more to demand and more to gain. It's just that, in the short-term, they need to figure out what to prioritize. But the fight will never end.
  
Line 366: Line 373:
 | Moral Panic Christianity           | Christians                                    | Satanists, atheists                                                                   | Media; table-top games; video games                                                                              |  No                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | | Moral Panic Christianity           | Christians                                    | Satanists, atheists                                                                   | Media; table-top games; video games                                                                              |  No                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
 | Open-Source Software Movement      | Developers, Users                             | Microsoft (primarily); Apple (secondarily); corporations; the Free Software Movement  | Proprietary software; closed source code; Embrace, Extend, Extinguish; overly-restrictive Open-Source Licensing  |  50/50((:fn:>They think that ideology is distracting. So it's more of a pragmatic disagreement than one over principles. But many big projects still go all-in. There's also a lot of overlap with the Free Software Movement.))                                  | | Open-Source Software Movement      | Developers, Users                             | Microsoft (primarily); Apple (secondarily); corporations; the Free Software Movement  | Proprietary software; closed source code; Embrace, Extend, Extinguish; overly-restrictive Open-Source Licensing  |  50/50((:fn:>They think that ideology is distracting. So it's more of a pragmatic disagreement than one over principles. But many big projects still go all-in. There's also a lot of overlap with the Free Software Movement.))                                  |
-| Post-Modern Anti-Semitism          | Non-Jews                                      | Jews                                                                                  | Anything controlled by Jews: the media; Hollywood; Banks; Health Industry; etc.                                  | No                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | +| Post-Modern Anti-Semitism          | Non-Jews                                      | Jews                                                                                  | Anything controlled by Jews: the media; Hollywood; Banks; Health Industry; etc.                                  |  No                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | 
-| Post-Modern Ukrainian Nationalism  | Ukrainians                                    | Russians, Rusophiles                                                                  | Russian Propaganda                                                                                               | Yes((:fn:>SocJus voluntarily adopted the position that Ukraine was better. Though Ukrainians themselves probably don't care.))                                                                                                                                    | +| Post-Modern Ukrainian Nationalism  | Ukrainians                                    | Russians, Rusophiles                                                                  | Russian Propaganda                                                                                               |  Yes((:fn:>SocJus voluntarily adopted the position that Ukraine was better. Though Ukrainians themselves probably don't care.))                                                                                                                                   | 
-| Piracy                             | Consumers                                     | Corporations                                                                          | Copyright law                                                                                                    | 50/50((:fn:>Individual pirates generally are not (they associate corporations with SocJus) but the European Pirate Parties are.))                                                                                                                                 |+| Piracy                             | Consumers                                     | Corporations                                                                          | Copyright law                                                                                                    |  50/50((:fn:>Individual pirates generally are not (they associate corporations with SocJus) but the European Pirate Parties are.))                                                                                                                                |
 | Satanism                           | Satanists; atheists; apatheists               | Christians                                                                            | The Bible; Insinuating Satan is bad                                                                              |  Yes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | | Satanism                           | Satanists; atheists; apatheists               | Christians                                                                            | The Bible; Insinuating Satan is bad                                                                              |  Yes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
 | SocJus Islam                       | Muslims                                       | Everyone else                                                                         | Non-Sharia law; secularism                                                                                       |  50/50((:fn:>Derived from Post-Colonial Theory, but can vary between those who are SocJus cosplaying as real Muslims or radical Islamists. The latter are opportunists, the former are stupid. Hasan Piker is probably the pre-eminent example of a cosplayer.))  | | SocJus Islam                       | Muslims                                       | Everyone else                                                                         | Non-Sharia law; secularism                                                                                       |  50/50((:fn:>Derived from Post-Colonial Theory, but can vary between those who are SocJus cosplaying as real Muslims or radical Islamists. The latter are opportunists, the former are stupid. Hasan Piker is probably the pre-eminent example of a cosplayer.))  |
-| SocJus Judaism                     | Jews                                          | Anti-Semites                                                                          | Holocaust denial; anti-semitic conspiracy theories                                                               | Yes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |+| SocJus Judaism                     | Jews                                          | Anti-Semites                                                                          | Holocaust denial; anti-semitic conspiracy theories                                                               |  Yes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
 | Veganism                           | Animals, vegans                               | Meat-eaters; restaurants; food industry                                               | I...can’t actually think of anything specific.                                                                   |  Yes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | | Veganism                           | Animals, vegans                               | Meat-eaters; restaurants; food industry                                               | I...can’t actually think of anything specific.                                                                   |  Yes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
 | TERFs (Feminist Theory)            | Women                                         | Men; Transgenders                                                                     | Same as Feminist Theory; Queer Theory                                                                            |  No((:fn:>Split off from SocJus.))                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | | TERFs (Feminist Theory)            | Women                                         | Men; Transgenders                                                                     | Same as Feminist Theory; Queer Theory                                                                            |  No((:fn:>Split off from SocJus.))                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
Line 397: Line 404:
  
 A lot of open-source projects gravitate towards SocJus via things like Codes of Conduct and disassociation with certain projects. There are some very extreme and laughable examples of this happening too, like Hundred Rabbits (100R) choosing to leave Github because Microsoft sells Office to ICE. No, I'm not joking, that is their actual reasoning.\\ A lot of open-source projects gravitate towards SocJus via things like Codes of Conduct and disassociation with certain projects. There are some very extreme and laughable examples of this happening too, like Hundred Rabbits (100R) choosing to leave Github because Microsoft sells Office to ICE. No, I'm not joking, that is their actual reasoning.\\
-Another blatant example of this would be [[https://nilesoft.org|Nilesoft]] which is a Windows Context Menu customizer. What on Earth does that have to do with with war in Palestine?+Another blatant example of this would be [[https://nilesoft.org|Nilesoft]] which is a Windows Context Menu customizer. What on Earth does that have to do with the war in Palestine?
  
 Both ideologies also have that one big enemy: Microsoft. And, yes, it's explicitly Microsoft. This is because neither movement cares what corporations they work with provided those corporations aren't Microsoft.\\ Both ideologies also have that one big enemy: Microsoft. And, yes, it's explicitly Microsoft. This is because neither movement cares what corporations they work with provided those corporations aren't Microsoft.\\
 A very small list of corporations they're fine with would be IBM, Red Hat, Sun Microsystems (when they still existed), Apple, Oracle and many more I can’t think of. A lot of these are at times much much worse than Microsoft, yet they don't care: because //Microsoft is the enemy//, not //Oracle//. A very small list of corporations they're fine with would be IBM, Red Hat, Sun Microsystems (when they still existed), Apple, Oracle and many more I can’t think of. A lot of these are at times much much worse than Microsoft, yet they don't care: because //Microsoft is the enemy//, not //Oracle//.
  
-And like any other Post-Modern ideology, they have the same blindspots. They don't realize that “Embrace, Extend, Extinguish” is a far better description of GNU and Linux's approach to competition than it does Microsoft.\\+And like any other Post-Modern ideology, they have the same blindspots. They don't realize that “Embrace, Extend, Extinguish” is a far better description of GNU and Linux's approach to competition than it does Microsoft's.\\
 The GNU Project was explicitly founded to clone proprietary software, then promote their use over proprietary software with the explicit goal of becoming the standard to kill proprietary software. How this is seen as ethical is beyond me, but Post-Modernists are not exactly rational thinkers.\\ The GNU Project was explicitly founded to clone proprietary software, then promote their use over proprietary software with the explicit goal of becoming the standard to kill proprietary software. How this is seen as ethical is beyond me, but Post-Modernists are not exactly rational thinkers.\\
 Linux has a similar approach, though it could be argued it's accidental rather than intentional like in the case of the GNU. Linux has a similar approach, though it could be argued it's accidental rather than intentional like in the case of the GNU.
Line 412: Line 419:
 Something else that's important to note is that the Free Software Movement //cannot// and //will not// support the abolition of copyright. On the surface this is strange and a little contradictory, but it makes sense once you realize...the truth.\\ Something else that's important to note is that the Free Software Movement //cannot// and //will not// support the abolition of copyright. On the surface this is strange and a little contradictory, but it makes sense once you realize...the truth.\\
 Both movements enforce Open-Source via their //software licenses// which dictate what can and can’t be done with their code. Without the license, there's no way to make sure that any fork of a project remains open-source (which is what they want).\\ Both movements enforce Open-Source via their //software licenses// which dictate what can and can’t be done with their code. Without the license, there's no way to make sure that any fork of a project remains open-source (which is what they want).\\
-Those software licenses are //copyright licenses// and, thus, //copyright// is a tool they sue to enforce open-source.+Those software licenses are //copyright licenses// and, thus, //copyright// is a tool they use to enforce open-source.
  
 This is why they're always quiet when the topic of abolishing copyright comes up: their movements would immediately disintegrate. This is why they're always quiet when the topic of abolishing copyright comes up: their movements would immediately disintegrate.
Line 476: Line 483:
 I want to write a dedicated article about [[lb:New Atheism]] at some point, so I'll try to keep this brief. I'll also note that this is one of the ideologies I disliked //before// realizing they were Post-Modernist. I want to write a dedicated article about [[lb:New Atheism]] at some point, so I'll try to keep this brief. I'll also note that this is one of the ideologies I disliked //before// realizing they were Post-Modernist.
  
-New Atheists clearly exemplify all the behaviors of a Post-Modern ideology and I felt a little embarrassed once I realized this. Their position is inherently irrational((:fn:>The idea that capital-G God doesn't exist and if he did we should reject him. In addition, they believe that religion has no positive effects.)) and they're selective about facts.\\+New Atheists clearly exemplify all the behaviors of a Post-Modern ideology and I felt a little embarrassed once I realized this. Their position is inherently irrational((:fn:>The idea that capital-G God doesn't exist (I'll note I'm not a Christian or follow an Abrahamic faith – my point here is that the most rational position to take is that you //don't know//, not that God //doesn't exist//) and if he did we should reject him. In addition, they believe that religion has no positive effects.)) and they're selective about facts.\\
 Plus, like many Post-modern ideologies, they tend to single out one entity as the main threat – Christianity – and mostly ignore other religions. Plus, like many Post-modern ideologies, they tend to single out one entity as the main threat – Christianity – and mostly ignore other religions.
  
Line 527: Line 534:
 ThePirateBay is itself a big rabbit-hole of “what the Hell’ if you bother to look into it...but just keep in mind that the statement “they flirt with Post-Modernism” isn't even the tip of the iceberg. If you're curious, look into Piratbyrån, Telecomix and Kopimi. All of those //really// explain what I mean. ThePirateBay is itself a big rabbit-hole of “what the Hell’ if you bother to look into it...but just keep in mind that the statement “they flirt with Post-Modernism” isn't even the tip of the iceberg. If you're curious, look into Piratbyrån, Telecomix and Kopimi. All of those //really// explain what I mean.
  
-Ironically, one of the other big representatives of this particular ideology is probably Mutahar, who is otherwise anti-SocJus. It's just really ironic that he doesn't realize his ideology is Post-Modern. And he also demonstrates Post-Modern-style hypocrisy like the situation surrounding the Switch 2.+Ironically, one of the other big representatives of this particular ideology is probably Mutahar,((:fn:>I had forgotten about him, but **Modern Vintage Gamer** is also a major representative of this ideology. In fact, I think I first identified it with him.)) who is otherwise anti-SocJus. It's just really ironic that he doesn't realize his ideology is Post-Modern. And he also demonstrates Post-Modern-style hypocrisy like the situation surrounding the Switch 2.
 ==== TERFs ==== ==== TERFs ====
 **Trans-Exclusionary Raidcal Feminists** or TERFs are a //very// interesting example and I hope to convince you why. **Trans-Exclusionary Raidcal Feminists** or TERFs are a //very// interesting example and I hope to convince you why.
Line 563: Line 570:
  
 As far as I know, the following ideas are tied to SocJus/Post-Modern thought in storytelling: As far as I know, the following ideas are tied to SocJus/Post-Modern thought in storytelling:
-  * [[lb:damsel.in.distress]] being universally negative.+  * [[lb:damsel.in.distress]] being universally perceived as negative.
   * [[lb:manic pixie dream girl|Manic Pixie Dream Girl]]. I believe the term originated with them and is considered universally negative.   * [[lb:manic pixie dream girl|Manic Pixie Dream Girl]]. I believe the term originated with them and is considered universally negative.
   * [[lb:ludo-narrative.dissonance]]: coined by Games Journalists, probably the pre-eminent example of being ideologically compromised.   * [[lb:ludo-narrative.dissonance]]: coined by Games Journalists, probably the pre-eminent example of being ideologically compromised.
lb/socjus.1752929953.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025-07-19 12:59:13 by ninjasr
Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki