Essarr LoreBook

Trying to go against the current

User Tools

Site Tools

lb:socjus

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
lb:socjus [2025-09-23 17:03:00] – ninjasrlb:socjus [2025-09-27 09:45:30] (current) – [What is it?] ninjasr
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== SocJus ====== ====== SocJus ======
-> My point is not that everything is bad, but that everything is dangerous, which is not exactly the same as bad. If everything is dangerous, then we always have something to do. So, my position leads not to apathy but to a hyper- and pessimistic activism. I think that the ethico-political choice we have to make every day is to determine which is the main danger.\\ +<blockquote> 
- --- //Michel Foucault//((:ref:>Reproduced from //[[libth>24335173|Cynical Theories]]// by Helen Pluckrose & James Lindsay, who got it from ‘“On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in+My point is not that everything is bad, but that everything is dangerous, which is not exactly the same as bad. If everything is dangerous, then we always have something to do. So, my position leads not to apathy but to a hyper- and pessimistic activism. I think that the ethico-political choice we have to make every day is to determine which is the main danger.\\ 
 +<cite> 
 +Michel Foucault((:ref:>Reproduced from //[[libth>24335173|Cynical Theories]]// by Helen Pluckrose & James Lindsay, who got it from ‘“On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in
 Progress,” afterword to Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Progress,” afterword to Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics,
 2nd ed., by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow (Chicago: University of 2nd ed., by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow (Chicago: University of
 Chicago Press, 1983).’ according to their footnote.)) Chicago Press, 1983).’ according to their footnote.))
 +</cite> 
 +</blockquote>
 **Social Justice**, or SocJus, is a collection of post-modernist ideologies and, like post-modernism, they can all comfortably be described as evil. **Social Justice**, or SocJus, is a collection of post-modernist ideologies and, like post-modernism, they can all comfortably be described as evil.
  
Line 125: Line 128:
 Currently, in 2025, SocJus is on the decline but remains quite influential. Post-Modernism itself seems to be partially but not fully affected. Hence the need for an article like this. Currently, in 2025, SocJus is on the decline but remains quite influential. Post-Modernism itself seems to be partially but not fully affected. Hence the need for an article like this.
 ==== What is it? ===== ==== What is it? =====
 +<WRAP caution>
 **Note:** I discovered that I actually did a bad job of explaining what post-modernism is which is obviously a grave error. I'll fix this issue at some point, hopefully in the near future. **Note:** I discovered that I actually did a bad job of explaining what post-modernism is which is obviously a grave error. I'll fix this issue at some point, hopefully in the near future.
 +</WRAP>
  
 SocJus is a Post-Modern ideology. I should note that I previously made the error of assuming it //was// Post-Modernism, which I realized was an error because there are //other// Post-Modern ideologies. But let's ignore those for now.\\ SocJus is a Post-Modern ideology. I should note that I previously made the error of assuming it //was// Post-Modernism, which I realized was an error because there are //other// Post-Modern ideologies. But let's ignore those for now.\\
lb/socjus.1758646980.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025-09-23 17:03:00 by ninjasr
Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki