lb:socjus
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| lb:socjus [2025-11-17 09:13:21] – [Half-Hearted] ninjasr | lb:socjus [2026-02-17 17:10:44] (current) – [Other Post-Modern Ideologies] ninjasr | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== SocJus ====== | ====== SocJus ====== | ||
| + | <div subtitle> | ||
| + | <span stamp navy> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| < | < | ||
| My point is not that everything is bad, but that everything is dangerous, which is not exactly the same as bad. If everything is dangerous, then we always have something to do. So, my position leads not to apathy but to a hyper- and pessimistic activism. I think that the ethico-political choice we have to make every day is to determine which is the main danger.\\ | My point is not that everything is bad, but that everything is dangerous, which is not exactly the same as bad. If everything is dangerous, then we always have something to do. So, my position leads not to apathy but to a hyper- and pessimistic activism. I think that the ethico-political choice we have to make every day is to determine which is the main danger.\\ | ||
| Line 95: | Line 98: | ||
| Hm, scratch the previous paragraph, I decided to list some of the tactics here with a one-sentence description just to give you an idea of ‘what' | Hm, scratch the previous paragraph, I decided to list some of the tactics here with a one-sentence description just to give you an idea of ‘what' | ||
| They are listed in no particular order and some of them are related to each-other: | They are listed in no particular order and some of them are related to each-other: | ||
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | : Post-Modernists are rarely honest about their intentions in discussions. Though this isn't always conscious. |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | : Post-Modernists tend to project their beliefs/ |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | : Post-Modernists like to over-complicate their language to make themselves feel and appear intellectually superior to their opponents, even if they don't understand the meanings of those words. |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | : Post-Modernists like to redefine words to make terminology more vague; or to make themselves appear/feel superior; or simply to explain internal ideological concepts to fellow adherents. |
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | |
| + | : Post-Modernists will go out of their way to change the terms they use to refer to each-other specifically to avoid accountability or hide from the general populace (which hates them). This is why the term ‘woke’ has become pejorative: people noticed that crazy people called themselves woke, so pattern-recognition took over. | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | : Post-Modernists like to label their opponents as conspiracy theorists. | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | : Post-Modernists rely heavily on ad-hominem attacks in the form of childish insults to win arguments. | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | : Post-Modernists are fine with compromising in the short-term as it contributes to their overall strategy of normalization. | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | : Post-Modernists, | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | : Either intentionally or unintentionally (due to stupidity), Post-Modernists will misrepresent their opponents and their arguments. This is just an ad-hominem. | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | : Post-Modernists like to isolate and block opposing voices for the sake of maintaining ideological purity. This has the intentional effect of increasing radicalization and the unintentional effect of creating echo chambers which warp perception of reality. | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | : Post-Modernists like to goad their opponents into attacking them and then crying to authority to make it seem like they' | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | : Post-Modernists will eternally portray themselves as victims for the sake of maintaining moral authority and superiority (within their view). The idea that a victim might be deserving of their position is directly contradictory to their worldview. | ||
| ===== Description ===== | ===== Description ===== | ||
| ==== A very brief history ==== | ==== A very brief history ==== | ||
| Line 198: | Line 226: | ||
| Let's use an example to illustrate what I mean: | Let's use an example to illustrate what I mean: | ||
| - | > Exercise is white supremacy.\\ | + | <div center-text> |
| + | <span denote> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| How any reasonable person can come to this conclusion is difficult to understand...until you break it down. Believe it or not, this //is// a rational position – in the sense that it can be reached thru rational thought, not that it is reasonable.\\ | How any reasonable person can come to this conclusion is difficult to understand...until you break it down. Believe it or not, this //is// a rational position – in the sense that it can be reached thru rational thought, not that it is reasonable.\\ | ||
| This position is gained via the alliance between Fat Studies and CRT. Fat Studies believes that exercise is a tool of oppression against them. That's step 1. But what's step 2? Statistically, | This position is gained via the alliance between Fat Studies and CRT. Fat Studies believes that exercise is a tool of oppression against them. That's step 1. But what's step 2? Statistically, | ||
| Line 372: | Line 402: | ||
| By this point, if you don't agree with me...I //failed//. But, if you do, great! | By this point, if you don't agree with me...I //failed//. But, if you do, great! | ||
| ===== Other Post-Modern Ideologies ===== | ===== Other Post-Modern Ideologies ===== | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | I used to think you're obsessed over post-modernists, | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| These are other Post-Modern ideologies that I, or others, have identified. These are not as prominent as the ‘Big 5’, but many do still flirt with them and, in some cases, are basically full-fledged members of SocJus. | These are other Post-Modern ideologies that I, or others, have identified. These are not as prominent as the ‘Big 5’, but many do still flirt with them and, in some cases, are basically full-fledged members of SocJus. | ||
| Line 550: | Line 586: | ||
| But what //does// matter is the //reason// you're pirating and, in the second example, it's explicitly to damage a corporation. | But what //does// matter is the //reason// you're pirating and, in the second example, it's explicitly to damage a corporation. | ||
| - | I mean, just take the phrase they love repeating so much: “It' | + | I mean, just take the phrase they love repeating so much: <q>“It' |
| It's a very Post-Modern way of thinking basically. | It's a very Post-Modern way of thinking basically. | ||
| Line 559: | Line 595: | ||
| One of the more insidious representatives of Post-Modern Piracy – though one unrelated to Reddit, interestingly enough – is ThePirateBay.\\ | One of the more insidious representatives of Post-Modern Piracy – though one unrelated to Reddit, interestingly enough – is ThePirateBay.\\ | ||
| ThePirateBay is responsible for birthing the Swedish Pirate Party, from which all the other European Pirate Parties came. And //all// of those parties are SocJus aligned, just that they' | ThePirateBay is responsible for birthing the Swedish Pirate Party, from which all the other European Pirate Parties came. And //all// of those parties are SocJus aligned, just that they' | ||
| - | ThePirateBay is itself a big rabbit-hole of “what the Hell’ if you bother to look into it...but just keep in mind that the statement “they flirt with Post-Modernism” isn't even the tip of the iceberg. If you're curious, look into Piratbyrån, | + | ThePirateBay is itself a big rabbit-hole of <q>“what the Hell”</ |
| Ironically, one of the other big representatives of this particular ideology is probably Mutahar, | Ironically, one of the other big representatives of this particular ideology is probably Mutahar, | ||
lb/socjus.1763370801.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025-11-17 09:13:21 by ninjasr