lb:spider-man
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| lb:spider-man [2025-12-30 18:49:33] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | lb:spider-man [2025-12-30 19:01:27] (current) – Forgot some minor formatting. Probably still missing some stuff. ninjasr | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Spider-Man ====== | ||
| + | **Spider-Man** is a Western comic franchise created by Marvel with a few other things attached to it. The franchise has been in a near-constant decline starting in the mid-2000s and continuing until today, with no hope in sight.\\ | ||
| + | The focus is on a super-hero named < | ||
| + | The Raimi Spider-Man films are among my favorites, though I haven' | ||
| + | {{tag> | ||
| + | ===== Reviews ===== | ||
| + | ==== Films ==== | ||
| + | === Spider-Man === | ||
| + | This film is very good.\\ | ||
| + | Like, very very good. | ||
| + | |||
| + | When compared to the comics, I think this film comes out on top. It adapts the emotional beats and stitches them in a way that is simply better.\\ | ||
| + | The main example I can think of is Uncle Ben's death. In the film, Peter is standing directly in the path of the thief: he's actually blocking his path. Because he's mad, he steps aside to let the thief get away. In the comic, Peter isn't standing in the thief' | ||
| + | I think you can see how the film's version is superior. | ||
| + | === Spider-Man 2 === | ||
| + | Yeah, this one is actually pretty good.\\ | ||
| + | The most egregious issue present in this film has to do with MJ, who is...bad. It's otherwise mostly a mix of good and bad. | ||
| + | === Spider-Man 3 === | ||
| + | After having re-watched this film, I honestly don't think it's that bad. I have trouble figuring out what specific storytelling issues are present. Maybe it's the lack of focus, though I felt the integration of the three villains actually //worked// and it seemed like some care was put into making it all cohesive. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The main issue is the ‘cringe sequence’ where Peter becomes evil due to Venom' | ||
| + | |||
| + | What's kinda weird is that you can interpret a lot of what happens in this film as a //direct result// of the previous film. What do I mean? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well, to start off with: in the previous film, MJ was doing //really// well for herself. Like, she was modelling and she was showing up in a lot of plays. However, in this film, she ends up in one Broadway musical, gets kicked out and then fails to find anything else except a job as a singing waitress at a jazz club. That's kinda incongruous, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Next, Spider-Man: in the previous film, Peter just kinda assumed that everyone hated him and this made him feel pretty awful about himself. However, by the end of the film, he learned that, actually, a //lot// of people really //really// love Spider-Man. Like, way more than he could imagine. Consequently, | ||
| + | |||
| + | It' | ||
| + | === The Amazing Spider-Man === | ||
| + | I re-watched this one not long after the third film and, well, I can understand why some people thought this film was better than the Raimi trilogy.\\ | ||
| + | The main issue with this film is that it doesn' | ||
| + | Later he messed up the basketball court to humiliate Flash and, well, I think that was reasonably well-put-together...at least while he's telling Flash to take the basketball (and he just makes it stick to him). After that point, it falls into ‘bad’ or ‘iffy at best’ since he's demonstrating physical abilities that he's obviously never had before that point...and nobody questions it.\\ | ||
| + | This was //also// a thing in the Raimi films, but seriously reduced...since, | ||
| + | Later, he chucks a football at...the thing, causing it to bend. Nobody questions this.\\ | ||
| + | There' | ||
| + | |||
| + | One other thing might be when he stole the thing for the internship, though I don't think it can be definitively said whether he felt bad or not about taking the card. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Something potentially quite interesting about this film is that it shows a bit of an in-between stage between the older tight/good writing and the more modern sloppy/bad writing, since this film has a mix of good and bad elements, whereas the Raimi films are mostly good. | ||
| + | ==== Spider-Man (1994) ==== | ||
| + | Peter is way more snarky in here than he is anywhere else, he really doesn' | ||
| + | Also, it's utterly bizarre how (at least in the first season) he seems way more interested in //< | ||
| + | |||
| + | I ended up finishing the first season (which I thought was okay at best) and then dropped it during the second season, because I was bored. Though I can’t tell you why. | ||
| + | ==== Comics ==== | ||
| + | I should note here that the rest of this article was written // | ||
| + | So, for reference, as of writing (<time [datetime=2025-12-30]> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The first issue that I read - Amazing Fantasy #15 - was pretty damn good, I can’t lie. It's basically the perfect origin story...just that adaptations tend to do a better job of adapting the origin, so not quite perfect.\\ | ||
| + | Uncle Ben dies off-panel for example. What? The < | ||
| + | I think the Raimi films depict it better. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Now to move onto the rest...I should note that Spider-Man is currently ‘on-hold’. The reason being that I got bored and annoyed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Let me elaborate: by that point, I had already seen some pretty serious issues with the storytelling that I just couldn' | ||
| + | The other issue is that the combat just isn't very good and it gets repetitive extremely fast. Actually, I'm reminded of [[lb: | ||
| + | The other other issue, which I think is much bigger, was that at some point the comic just started assuming you had been reading The Spectacular Spider-Man as well. The moment that really threw me for a loop was when I saw Gloria Grant((: | ||
| + | |||
| + | I know that some of this can be solved by skimming, but I'm fundamentally allergic to skimming, so I took a break instead. I don't know when I'll get back to it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is the writing good? Uh...I' | ||
| + | That is to say...if I wanted to read it //again//, I probably wouldn' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ah! I almost forgot that I wanted to explain something else. My plan was to stop reading Amazing sometime before One More Day so I could jump into Spider-Girl instead. That plan is still in place, though it would require reading up to Issue 406 which is...a bit of a distance from #182. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't think the artwork is super great either, though I can’t complain either because it's the 60s (well, 70s now). | ||
| + | === Mary-Jane (2004) === | ||
| + | Yes, I read the weird teen romantic drama spin-off. Hear me out: I like MJ, I wanted more MJ sooner without having to read something that was dependent on the main comics. I saw that the artstyle was vaguely anime-like, so I jumped in. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Turns out that uh...yeah, this isn't very good. It's extremely angsty to the point of absurdity. And at times it's just straight-up stupid. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Would I recommend reading it? Not really. There are a few points where it's a little funny but that's it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think it's a shame, too, since the base concept isn't bad: Mary-Jane has developed a crush on Spider-Man, so she starts investigating him while her friends think she's going crazy.\\ | ||
| + | That itself could lead to a lot of fun situations...but they went for stupid melodrama instead. | ||
| + | ===== Characters & World-building ===== | ||
| + | I haven' | ||
| + | ==== Peter Parker ==== | ||
| + | When I picked this article again, I found I had nothing written here. So I'll just quickly note a few things. | ||
| + | |||
| + | He is very unlike the nerd stereotype after he graduates from Highschool. Even in Highschool it was kinda borderline. He was extremely snarky and frequently back-talked to Flash. So his depiction in The Amazing Spider-Man might be more accurate from that angle. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, in the Raimi films, it is // | ||
| + | ==== J. Jonah Jameson ==== | ||
| + | I think he might be my favorite character, since MJ is currently not super deep as of the point I am in the comics. I think he was people' | ||
| + | |||
| + | I can definitely write more about him, but I'm not really feeling up to it right now. Just that...his motivation in the comics is quite literally that he's jealous of Spider-Man. He can’t understand why someone would do the things he does without expecting any money for it. That's notable because JJJ does everything he does for the sake of money (at least so he claims). There might be more to him, but JJJ is generally pretty simple at the point I'm at. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the Raimi films, JJJ is a bit different. I have a pet theory that he doesn' | ||
| + | ==== Betty Brant ==== | ||
| + | In the comics, Betty is Peter' | ||
| + | Mostly related to Liz Allan, who is very obviously trying to get with Peter. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Much later in the comics (yeah, I gotta re-write all the character stuff on the wiki), Peter and she break up. She ends up with Ned instead (IIRC), then she considers cheating on Ned with Peter. Though what happens next I don't know, because that's the last thing I saw before I put reading on pause.\\ | ||
| + | She is canonically not as pretty as MJ. That is all.\\ | ||
| + | Her and Peter' | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the Raimi films, she's kinda flirty and part of the Daily Bugle cast. Mostly unimportant otherwise. | ||
| + | ==== Liz Allan ==== | ||
| + | Peter tries to ask her out several times and she finally says yes, but has to cancel the date due to Spider-Man business.\\ | ||
| + | After Peter is unintentionally unmasked (but nobody realizes he's Spider-Man because he was sick), she did a 180 on him and actually got a super crush on him. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I really liked the dynamic presented in the comics (Liz/ | ||
| + | Anyway, she was the nice/hot girl...but is also canonically not as hot as MJ. Just putting that out there. Though she //is// considered prettier than Betty. | ||
| + | |||
| + | When Peter was dating Betty, she didn't seem to care, and just saw Betty as competition for Peter. | ||
| + | ==== Mary-Jane Watson ==== | ||
| + | MJ's entire section is a bit of a mess, so I'm just leaving it the way it is until I bother to look at it later. It's not the easiest to read thru, but I think it's understandable enough. It's also a bit out-of-date, | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the films it's pretty obvious that MJ is dating the people she's dating for the sake of status, rather than actual love.\\ | ||
| + | She pulls away and slightly recoils when Flash tries to play with her hair...and she's his girlfriend. When she's with Harry, he leans in to kiss her and she turns her head.\\ | ||
| + | She also smiles more genuinely at Peter than anyone else.\\ | ||
| + | However, something that's kinda odd is that she seems to know Peter more than Peter thinks she does. First of all, she smiles at him at the exhibition. Second, when he punches Flash, she's more concerned about //him// than she is about her // | ||
| + | There' | ||
| + | I find this odd because Peter, via his narration and attitude, gives off the implication that they' | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the second film, she is legitimately just a bad person. As in, she's adulterous and a bit of a bitch, to put it lightly.\\ | ||
| + | However, I thought of something. In the second film, she's a pretty successful model/ | ||
| + | My theory is based on contextual evidence: in the second film, she's engaged to and almost marries John Jameson, the astronaut, but then bails on the wedding day to be with Peter. This is // | ||
| + | It's a theory though...there isn't much evidence to actually support it. | ||
| + | === Comics === | ||
| + | In the comics, she's initially a running gag...though, | ||
| + | First of all, Gwen has not been mentioned by Issue 29 at all...but MJ's been mentioned several times and has even made an appearance...albeit, | ||
| + | Her personality also seems to be somewhat defined, so I'm not sure what exactly' | ||
| + | Also, it's either intentional or unintentional genius, but her starting as a running gag who barely appears and then becomes //the// girl is just...perfect. Like, the setup here is insanely good. | ||
| + | ==== Flash Thompson ==== | ||
| + | He's Peter' | ||
| + | He also appears in the Raimi films, The Amazing Spider-Man films and the 1994 cartoon. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the comics, he's convinced (even after being dumped) that Liz is still his girlfriend...which is really freaking weird. This is probably because she dumped him with the intent of getting with Peter, which he just finds utterly unfathomable. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Later on in the comics, Flash goes to Vietnam and comes back. There is an entire series of sub-plots involving him and what followed him back. He also briefly flirted with Gwen (who gave him a kiss when he went to Vietnam...yeah, | ||
| + | Peter also stays at his apartment briefly though I don't remember the context. | ||
| + | ==== Gwen Stacy ==== | ||
| + | She first appears in issue 31 and she's immediately interested in Peter. Amusingly, though, since Peter is occupied with other things, she actually gets brushed off by him, which rubs her the wrong way.\\ | ||
| + | Consequently, | ||
| + | According to her (in the first issue she appears in), Peter' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Gwen as a character is uh...I dunno how to describe it. I don't think there' | ||
| + | Now: her character. She's a bit boring, I dunno what to say. Though that's not fair. She's a nice rich girl and possibly a little liberal in disposition. I say that because she once offers to go watch an art film with Peter. I looked that art film up later and...I can’t believe they even mentioned it in the comic. The tension in their relationship mostly stems from the fact Gwen hates Spider-Man (because she thinks her dad was killed by him, but she had been scared of Spider-Man prior as well). This didn't just guarantee that Peter could never tell her...because of Peter' | ||
| + | |||
| + | I also thought that the way Gwen's face was drawn made her look prettier than MJ. I found that deeply ironic, seeing as MJ was supposed to be the prettier one...at least that's what I think? | ||
| + | |||
| + | There is something ironic to note about her portrayal in adaptations. She's absent in < | ||
| + | In < | ||
| + | In < | ||
| + | ==== Harry Osborn ==== | ||
| + | Appears in issue 31. | ||
| + | |||
| + | That's all I wrote, so that's all I'll say for now. Just that the integration of him as a continuation of the Green Goblin is kinda...I dunno. | ||
| + | ===== Trivilinks ===== | ||
| + | * At this point someone might wonder why I haven' | ||
| + | * I noticed that I left this unfinished for a while...so I polished it a little to release it. | ||
| + | * I forgot to add sections on the Venom films. Ah well, later. | ||