lb:warcraft
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
lb:warcraft [2025-04-30 17:24:37] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | lb:warcraft [2025-05-04 08:00:30] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation ninjasr | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== Warcraft ====== | ||
+ | {{ img: | ||
+ | **Warcraft** is a fantasy(ish) game franchise created by Blizzard. It was initially a series of RTS games, then an MMO called **World of Warcraft**, which you've probably heard of once or twice. Besides the games, there are several books and comics expanding and tearing apart the story.\\ | ||
+ | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[lb: | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{tag> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Notes ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | My regular approach to canon is kinda broken here so I initially wanted to present canon information together with retcons...but, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Reviews ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== RTS Games ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Warcraft 3: Reign of Chaos === | ||
+ | |||
+ | The story here is good...I think. Though there is an obvious problem in that it doesn' | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Warcraft 3: Frozen Throne === | ||
+ | |||
+ | The story here is pretty good as well. I mean, it's the second half of Arthas' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Warcraft (Film) ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | I'll be honest...I think fans are too harsh with this film. Blizzard was less respectful towards Warcraft and they //own// it.\\ I occasionally re-watch the film because I legitimately like it. The aesthetic was nailed (though I would have preferred the WC3-era aesthetics). The plot //just works// and, while trying to make the worldbuilding cohesive is an un-enviable job...they did a pretty good job with making it all fit. Ironically, I've found fans don't like that it wasn't a good adaptation...but it did do a good job adapting lore that constantly changes.\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The pacing is off, and the film would have benefitted from being longer. Or being re-written. | ||
+ | * The acting is just bad. Khadgar is an exception, Lothar is weird, the orcs are good in general, but everyone else is just bad. | ||
+ | * They fail to explain a lot of the stuff in the film. The film expects you to just know who the Kirin Tor are, what Dalaran is, what Stormwind is, etc. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I'd say the Warcraft film is a mix of good and bad. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Animated Shorts ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | All of the shorts have the same issue: they are setup for laughable payoff. That should be kept in mind when watching all of them. They can be good, on their own...but, yeah, they amount to nothing. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === The Burdens of Shaohao === | ||
+ | |||
+ | So here's the major exception. These shorts are actually quite nice...just that they don't really fit in with Warcraft.\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Lords of War === | ||
+ | |||
+ | These are all pretty okay. There are no particular issues...yeah, | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Harbingers === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Among the three...uh...Khadgar' | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Warbringers === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Jaina' | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Dragonflight Legacies === | ||
+ | |||
+ | This was honestly the worst of all the animated shorts. It's a serious downgrade from the previous ones. I'd argue that even the Illidan and Khadghar Harbingers ones (which, of the previous animated shorts, are definitely the worst) are better than this series. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Speculah & Analysis ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== WoW isn't suited for story ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | I don't think MMOs are well-suited for telling a story, as they require a great time commitment from the players...which also means that there are huge gaps between cinematics //and// the massive gaps between expansions doesn' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Issues with Warcraft ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | What are the central issues with the Warcraft series? I believe I've identified a few. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Aesthetics === | ||
+ | |||
+ | I'm really concerned with aesthetics, which is why I've noticed that Warcraft' | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Retcons! === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Warcraft over-relies on retcons. Though, I guess it's more accurate to say there' | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Writing === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Even excluding the retcons, Warcraft' | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Memory Loss === | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is more an issue with the Warcraft (and technically StarCraft) fanbase rather than Warcraft itself, but the writers manage to get away with a lot of stuff due to this.\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Trivilinks ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | * Actually quite good, but doesn' | ||
+ | * The term I use for it (WoWW or WoW Wiki) is technically not correct, as it's simply the ‘Warcraft Wiki’, but I don't think it matters too much. | ||
+ | * [[1d6> | ||
+ | * [[1d6> | ||
+ | * [[1d6> | ||
+ | * If you're wondering about the quote in the banner: watch [[you> | ||
+ | * Despite the use of a [[lb: | ||
+ | * I just remembered this...but when Reforged first came out, I was shocked by how //bad// it looked. It still looks pretty bad. Are there people who seriously think this looks better? |