lb:wnotes:succubus
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| lb:wnotes:succubus [2025-10-13 19:48:17] – [Writing Notes for Succubi] ninjasr | lb:wnotes:succubus [2025-10-17 16:05:05] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation 111.119.254.90 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| Mesopotamia is a pretty obvious choice for an origin point of the succubi, since that's where the earliest myths originate //and// there' | Mesopotamia is a pretty obvious choice for an origin point of the succubi, since that's where the earliest myths originate //and// there' | ||
| - | This is the most obvious origin-point and the one I'd favor. Though I can’t think of any other origin points. | + | This is the most obvious origin-point and the one I'd favor. |
| It's also possible that succubi could just exist openly in Mesopotamia. | It's also possible that succubi could just exist openly in Mesopotamia. | ||
| + | === Rise of Christianity === | ||
| + | This is the other possibility for an origin point, which I'm pointing out because I feel some connection could be made between Christianity being all < | ||
| + | === Black Death === | ||
| + | On the surface, I'm betting this is a completely bizarre connection but hear me out. I had read once (probably on Wikipedia) that the Black Death helped to ruin the image of brothels. Because people started linking sex/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thus a connection could be made here. But, if that connection //is// made, that means that Succubi are related to disease in some way. What that could mean is anyone' | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm bringing this up as an origin point because I think it sounds interesting. | ||
| ==== Secrecy? ==== | ==== Secrecy? ==== | ||
| Whether succubi would prioritize maintaining secrecy from humanity or not is a big question mark. It depends heavily on whether sex with a succubus is fatal or not.\\ | Whether succubi would prioritize maintaining secrecy from humanity or not is a big question mark. It depends heavily on whether sex with a succubus is fatal or not.\\ | ||
| Line 86: | Line 94: | ||
| I think they'd be super protective of their husbands, though that might not always guarantee their own fidelity (it's about eating to them, after all). | I think they'd be super protective of their husbands, though that might not always guarantee their own fidelity (it's about eating to them, after all). | ||
| ===== Miscellaneous Worldbuilding ===== | ===== Miscellaneous Worldbuilding ===== | ||
| + | ==== Adultery ==== | ||
| + | Recently, I was reading the [[lb: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anyway, in the Daeva clanbook there' | ||
| + | It may be shocking to read but, as a relative //good boy//, I didn't actually consider this outside of assuming it would be a bad idea. | ||
| + | |||
| + | So what do I think after thinking about it? I think that succubi (and, by extension, vampires as well) would actually avoid creating adulterous relationships. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The big reason why is because it //could// attract attention towards them, which is a mighty big risk. It's an entirely unnecessary risk too, since you can nab a boyfriend/ | ||
| + | It doesn' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Whether they know/ | ||
| ==== Disease ==== | ==== Disease ==== | ||
| Assuming that succubi can still carry diseases (STDs and otherwise), some of them might be far more dangerous than others. | Assuming that succubi can still carry diseases (STDs and otherwise), some of them might be far more dangerous than others. | ||
lb/wnotes/succubus.1760384897.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025-10-13 19:48:17 by ninjasr