Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- lb:wnotes:vampires [2025-09-15 15:30:33] – [Speciation?] ninjasr
+++ lb:wnotes:vampires [2025-09-15 19:41:46] (current) – [Mesopotamia & Egypt] ninjasr
@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 While I think Mesopotamia is the better origin point, Egypt is a close second. This is because neither is the clear ‘winner’ here.\\
-Mesopotamia is much older than Egypt (and the earliest civilizations were reportedly quite fragile((:ref:debt)) meaning you could tie them to vampires). But Mesopotamia was a bunch of rival city-states while Egypt was centralized. Egypt also had a higher population density.\\
+Mesopotamia is much older than Egypt (and the earliest civilizations were reportedly quite fragile((:ref:atgrain)) meaning you could tie them to vampires). But Mesopotamia was a bunch of rival city-states while Egypt was centralized. Egypt also had a higher population density.\\
 Centralization makes it easier to move around without being spotted.\\
@@ Line 379: / Line 379: @@
 I think this can only be justified with magic, the vampires being alive or the vampires being in a weird semi-alive semi-dead state (as is implied with the //Requiem// vampires)...or the vampires already starting as separate species with similar traits.
+One of the big considerations is numbers...assuming the above ratio of 1 vampire per 100k humans...there would be 80,000 vampires globally nowadays. The more species there are, the less believable it'll become. So this requires a lot of care.
 ===== Miscellaneous =====
 ==== Moonbathing ====