Essarr LoreBook

Trying to go against the current

User Tools

Site Tools


lb:umineko

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
lb:umineko [2025-10-11 09:50:03] – [Why this breaks the Promise] ninjasrlb:umineko [2025-10-20 14:02:12] (current) – [The Red Truths] Re-formatted the presentation to be more aesthetically pleasing. Also fixed an error. ninjasr
Line 159: Line 159:
 Now let's explain it. Let's assume we have the following Red Truth: **Jessica killed Rudolph.** Now let's explain it. Let's assume we have the following Red Truth: **Jessica killed Rudolph.**
  
-Most people would assume that that means that Rudolph was killed by Jessica, right? However, because a Red Truth is fine as long as one of any possible interpretations is true...heh.\\  //Who// is ‘Jessica’? Does it refer to the person whose name it is? Does it refer to someone pretending to be Jessica? Does it refer to a persona taken up by another person? Is it a fictional character? Is it even a person?\\  //What// does ‘killed’ actually mean? Does it mean that someone was literally killed? Does it mean that someone was killed metaphorically? Is ‘killed’ hyperbolic? //Who// is ‘Rudolph’? We already went over that.+Most people would assume that that means that Rudolph was killed by Jessica, right? However, because a Red Truth is fine as long as one of any possible interpretations is true...heh.\\  //Who// is ‘Jessica’? Does it refer to the person whose name it is? Does it refer to someone pretending to be Jessica? Does it refer to a persona taken up by another person? Is it a fictional character? Is it even a person?\\  //What// does ‘killed’ actually mean? Does it mean that someone was literally killed? Does it mean that someone was killed metaphorically? Is ‘killed’ hyperbolic?\\ 
 +//Who// is ‘Rudolph’? //We already went over that//.
  
 Because of how much is up to interpretation, it's entirely possible that nobody died and neither Jessica nor Rudolph were involved. And somehow George is dead. Because of how much is up to interpretation, it's entirely possible that nobody died and neither Jessica nor Rudolph were involved. And somehow George is dead.
Line 166: Line 167:
  
 Let's make a list of Red Truths: Let's make a list of Red Truths:
 +<div card vstack warning center-text>
 +**Janet died in the room.**
  
-  * **Janet died in the room.** +**Janet was dead in the kitchen.**
-  * **Janet was dead in the kitchen.** +
-  * **Janet was killed by Katie.** +
-  * **The murder was committed with a knife.** +
-  * **Janet didn't die by suicide.** +
-  * **Janet died at 12:00.** +
-  * **Janet made tea at 1:00 PM.**+
  
 +**Janet was killed by Katie.**
 +
 +**The murder was committed with a knife.**
 +
 +**Janet didn't die by suicide.**
 +
 +**Janet died at 12:00.**
 +
 +**Janet made tea at 1:00 PM.**
 +</div>
 Now, keep in mind that the story itself reportedly does what I'm about to do. This may look pretty “case-closed”, but remember that a Red Truth is true as long as one of any interpretations is true. Now, keep in mind that the story itself reportedly does what I'm about to do. This may look pretty “case-closed”, but remember that a Red Truth is true as long as one of any interpretations is true.
  
lb/umineko.1760176203.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025-10-11 09:50:03 by ninjasr

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki